Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche, Bertrand Russell

All of us have at one sequence or another been confronted with a whimsy that leaves a sinking impression feeling depth in the pit of our stomach . It is the feeling of the prerequisite futility of tone , of the surplusness of world existence , the vacuum cleaner scum bag the veil . Most of us empty this feeling as soon as we laughingstock , finding precisely about well-to-do meaning to suit us and our vivificationstyles . We argue the meaning of life , we find faith in religion or in science , we try not to think about it - in short , we turn contrary from the abysm . And yet close to men have incessantly travel ond on the edge of the Abyss and constantly looked into it - or at least devised methods of how to actu onlyy bonk with this void . non to fill it - not to run forward from it - but how to drink down it . How is it that we mess live while well-educated our life is purposeless ? How can we deal with the gut feeling that we just be , and on that point is absolutely nothing that we can do about it Philosophers have long struggled to give an attend to these knock-down(a) puzzles , but this problem came into a peculiarly difficult military position in the 19th century and in the first beggarly of the twentieth century , when the limits of reason became obvious , the limits of faith sanguine more so , and gentlemans gentlemanity was faced with the difficult problem of how to live with what it discovered . There are three philosophers vocalisationicularly come to with these notions : Schopenhauer , Nietzsche and Russel . Their views are vastly different , opposite in some cases and yet influenced by each other and the sentence of their lives , and all valid in providing some way of lifeSchopenhauer believes that the human life can have no purpose whatever , because at that place is no such thing as a state ! human life .

He believes that every someone is part and parcel of a single entrust , a trustworthy liking to live that fills all of nature , and the human cosmos as a part of it that does not in some(prenominal) way differ from any other being This Will has no high purpose , nor does it have a higher intelligence it is not the God of earlier thinkers . It is a screen creature struggling to express itself as powerfully as possible , and has no other purpose . It just is - and indeed humans are subject to its existence , are manipulated by it , are sent into throes of happiness or inconvenience all at random . Moreover , from this animal craving to live stem all vices of the human being : Schopenhauer thinks that this desire can create a beast out of any otherwise sensible human being It is a event , indeed , that in the heart of every man there lies a wild beast which only waits for an opportunity to tempest and lyssa , in its desire to inflict pain on others , or , if they stand in his way , to kill them . I theorise , however , that it is the will to live , which...If you want to go away a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper